Monday, July 6, 2009

Properly Using Power and Authority

By Daniel Davis
It was Sunday morning, and I was rushing around to finish getting ready for church. My wife had already gone ahead to help with the worship team. I was wrapping things up at home, trying to gather up our two preschool boys and get them into the car.

Evan, our four-year-old, had a toy in his hands and was trying to ask me a question.

“Put the toy away and come on, Evan,” I said.

“Daddy, I want to take my puppy with me.”

“No, son let’s go.” I kept gathering up my Bible and notes for the sermon that morning.

“Please Daddy.” I mumbled something in return and kept getting stuff together. Finally, when I was about to go, I ignored what he was saying and grabbed the stuffed animal from his hands and tossed it aside: “Let’s go.”

That’s when it hit me. The look on my son’s face was embarrassing. He was confused and a little hurt. He did not understand why I had acted that way.

In that moment I had given in to temptation. I was big; he was little. I wanted something; he wanted something else. I could take it from him; he could not stop me. I had the power; he did not.

I used my power at that moment to impose my will on him regardless of his personality and will. Of course, had the occasion been something that threatened his life, I would not have thought twice. But it wasn’t. I was merely inconvenienced and thus forced my way. In that moment, I depersonalized him and the look on his face told it all.

***

As spiritual leaders, we are, whether we realize it or not, accorded tremendous amounts of power. Scripture enjoins believers to obey leadership (e.g., Hebrews 13.17). In addition, many people give such heed to the words of spiritual leaders (for good or ill) that they live in fear of their disapproval. As if that wasn’t enough, we tend to spend a lot of time making sure that our churches know they should follow and honor us.

Though certainly a question worth examination, my focus here is not on the amount of power we have. My focus is on what we do with it. Nearly every day we are tempted as leaders to ignore the personhood of the people we lead and focus on our own desires and use power to gain those desires. We are constantly tempted to impose our will for the sake of speed or convenience and bring our will to pass. I suggest that when we yield to that temptation we no longer use power rightly. Instead, we have become no better than the nihilist who believes that the only purpose for existence is to “will to power.” Certainly this flies in the face of the One who took on weakness to destroy evil.

So what is power for? I propose it is for love. Indeed, I would even say that love is the power we wield. When we love, we will and act in the best interest of the object of that love. In the case of my son, acting in love would mean I would have stopped, listened, and respected his personhood. Of course, in the end it would have been unreasonable for him to take that particular toy to church. However, I could have accomplished the same end in a way that humbled myself and respected his personal dignity.

The same goes for the way we treat those that we lead in the church. Certainly we become frustrated at times. Nevertheless, we are still called upon to act in love. We are pressed by the Spirit to lay aside the power of imposed will – such is what the world uses – and take up the self-denying and self-giving love of the cross.

In the short term, such ways seem inefficient and fruitless. No doubt it appeared that way to the followers of Jesus when they saw him go to the cross. But in the end, I think, as we see in the death and resurrection of Jesus, that there is no power greater than love.

So how do we use our power? To what end do we wield it? What is the power that we use?

3 comments:

  1. I think this article is a step in the right direction. I was pondering this post yesterday and had a couple thoughts I could not get away from. One is how shepherding came into being as a reaction to disorder in Charismatic circles and second how that the more carnal a person becomes the more power the want for themselves.

    Imagine the irony in those two thoughts. A movement that began to stop immorality became a means of controlling the people. There are still, unfortunately, Pentecostal/Charismatic teachers and ministers that promote this same nonsense through books like 'Under Cover', etc.

    These secular power structures were never intended to be part of the Church. Jesus said, "It shall not be so among you... for the greatest among you shall be your servant." It is sad that our beloved King James Bible is responsible for much of this problem. It is well beyond then scope of this reply, but I have studied this out through various writings such as 'All the Kings Men' and have had these type conversations with pro-KJV Full Gospel scholars in the UK and they agree and even point out how the translators were given strict instructions to interpret several Greek terms specifically to show the lay readers their responsibility to yield to church authority. What is worse is that the newer versions to a large degree maintain this.

    And I think this is why many are fleeing the organized church by the millions. Barna points this out, but it has been happening for a very long time. Being on the doorstep of IHOP and the former KC Prophet/Metro Church mess we have seen these abuses first hand as the area is loaded with disillusioned believers that have been abused by Shepherding practices. Some I have met will not darken the door of any church.

    So in answer to the question let me say that if we overstep in our oversight of God's heritage, the Church that He purchased with His own blood, to which the Holy Spirit has given us the oversight- then we have become those that Paul wept and cried about for 3 years warning day and night Ephesus in Acts 20. What a sobering and dreadful thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I must speak regarding the malignment of Under Cover in a previous comment...

    I read and liked both Under Cover by John Bevere and Spiritual Authority by Watchman Nee. Both books helped reshape the attitude I have towards those I serve under.

    I see both books as being addressed to those who serve, not to those who lead. I do not recall much text in the books about how to get those under you to submit, but plenty of text regarding the blessing and need of submission to one's authorities.

    I see a large difference between the sort of submission discussed in these books and the sort I hear about in the "Shepherding" movement. While I'm not familiar with the KC group, I have heard of a church in south-central Michigan that requires its members to have pastoral approval on issues such as buying cars and property. Such a level of submission is far and beyond that called for in Under Cover and Spiritual Authority.

    I do not believe for a minute that Jesus wants power struggles in His church. He does not want leaders brow-beating their flock saying, "You listen to me! Submit! Obey!" Paul told Timothy, "the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves;..." Compassionate, loving, servant-leadership is absolutely required of any who would lead God's flock.

    But on the flip side, when it comes to our attitudes towards those who lead us, God wants us to honor, respect, and even obey the parents, elders, teachers, pastors, bishops, and civil authorities God has placed over us (as long as said obedience doesn't go against a higher authority). My belief is not based solely on a few "proof texts", but I see honor and respect as a common thread running throughout the Bible, much too frequent in occurence to be solely the contrived output of KJV translators.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ken,

    'All the Kings Men' in my original post is actually 'God's Secretaries' (recently retitled 'The Power and the Glory') by Adam Nicholson.

    ReplyDelete